The newest validity and you can accuracy of one’s questionnaire had been looked at and remedied according to the pre-attempt

The newest validity and you can accuracy of one’s questionnaire had been looked at and remedied according to the pre-attempt

To the , this study chosen two categories for the Chengdu Shishi middle school and you can Jinniu middle school respectively, delivered 3 hundred questionnaires, recovered 278 forms, subtracted several incorrect surveys and you can 266 good surveys. The certified data was finished from .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical relationship studies are a mathematical strategy accustomed test the fresh new relationship degree anywhere interracial cupid between you to definitely selection of manage variables and one group away from requirement variables

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Mathematical Analytics

It aims to select the limit correlation amongst the linear consolidation out of control parameters in addition to linear mix of standards parameters. Therefore, canonical relationship investigation testing the fresh new canonical correlation blend of multiple standards parameters and you can numerous manage details, Canonical relationship analysis can create a combination of extreme and you can insignificant canonical relationship. Fundamentally, it will deliver the pursuing the very first recommendations: one is the average relationship coefficient can echo the new relationship training between the linear combination of manage details therefore the linear combination of practical details. The typical relationship coefficient must arrived at a life threatening level to help you represent the key relationship between the two groups of linear combos. The second is new judgment coefficient (i.age., the latest square worth of regular correlation coefficient Roentgen). This means that regular items of standard adjustable is also become said by normal affairs of one’s control variable (for around ten%). The third is the structural coefficient (normal load). It is intended to handle this new relationship within changeable and you will brand new standards varying on their respective regular linear combinations. Absolutely the property value the latest coefficient have to be more than 0.30 to explain one to their particular regular linear combinations enjoys explanatory fuel.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir